Relationships between occupational functioning and stress among radio journalists - Assessment by means of the psychosocial risk scale.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractJob characteristics and the consequences of everyday stress among radio journalists who are not exposed to traumatic events have not been studied sufficiently before. We aimed at determining the most common job characteristics and their stressfulness; relationships between stress exposure, health and occupational functioning; differences between radio journalists and other journalists, and also the psychosocial risk for health and functioning in this group.
The studied group involved 208 journalists, 134 of whom worked in radio stations. The respondents filled in the Psychosocial Risks Scale (PRS) developed by the Department of Health and Work Psychology of the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland.
Requirement of mental effort and readiness to response quickly for most of the time as well as limited possibilities for promotion were the most frequent journalists' complaints. We confirmed that higher levels of stress resulted in worse functioning - the radio journalists who experienced lower stress assessed their health status and ability to work better, were more satisfied with particular aspects of their work, and were more involved in their work. They also presented a significantly lower turnover intention. Moreover, the radio journalists were more involved in their work than other journalists, but experienced lower satisfaction, took more sick leaves and had more days of absence.
Well-known relationships between stress level, satisfaction and occupational functioning were confirmed. The most important conclusion refers to the fact that psychosocial risks and stress analysis should be based on the understanding of specificity of each occupation or even position. It is so, because the same job characteristic may pose a challenge for one person, while for another - it can result in extreme discomfort and anxiety - such an attitude broadens understanding of the phenomenon. We also confirmed that the PRS is a well-designed method, appropriate to investigate an individual perception of job environment and its stressfulness. Future research on causal relationships between the variables is recommended.
CitationInt J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(1):85-100.
Sponsorsgrant number POKL.02.01.02-00-031/10
The following license files are associated with this item:
- [Occupational stress and psychosocial risk among journalists].
- Authors: Najder A, Merecz-Kot D
- Issue date: 2014
- The relationship between psychosocial risks and occupational functioning among miners.
- Authors: Mościcka-Teske A, Sadłowska-Wrzesińska J, Najder A, Butlewski M
- Issue date: 2019 Feb 27
- Occupational stress and job satisfaction of healthcare staff in rehabilitation units.
- Authors: Fiabane E, Giorgi I, Musian D, Sguazzin C, Argentero P
- Issue date: 2012 Nov-Dec
- [What do we know about psychosocial risks at work? Part II.The analysis of employee's knowledge of sources and consequences of stress at work].
- Authors: Potocka A, Merecz-Kot D
- Issue date: 2010
- Stressful work characteristics, health indicators and work behavior: the case of machine operators.
- Authors: Mościcka-Teske A, Sadłowska-Wrzesińska J, Butlewski M, Misztal A, Jacukowicz A
- Issue date: 2017 Dec