AHR- and DNA-damage-mediated gene expression responses induced by benzo(a)pyrene in human cell lines.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsHockley, Sarah L.
Arlt, Volker M.
Te Poele, Robert
Phillips, David H.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractCarcinogens induce complex transcriptional responses in cells that may hold key mechanistic information. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) modulation of transcription may occur through the activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) or through responses to DNA damage. To characterize further the expression profiles induced by BaP in HepG2 and MCF-7 cells obtained in our previous study, they were compared to those induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), which activates AHR but does not bind to DNA, and anti-benzo(a)pyrene- trans-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE), which binds directly to DNA but does not activate AHR. A total of 22 genes had altered expression in MCF-7 cells after both BaP and TCDD exposure, and a total of 29 genes had altered expression in HepG2 cells. In both cell lines, xenobiotic metabolism was upregulated through induction of NQO1, MGST1, and CYP1B1. A total of 78 expression changes were induced by both BaP and BPDE in MCF-7 cells, and a total of 29 expression changes were induced by both BaP and BPDE in HepG2 cells. These genes were predominantly involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and DNA repair. BaP and BPDE caused the repression of histone genes in both cell lines, suggesting that regulation of these genes is an important component of the DNA damage response. Interestingly, overlap of the BPDE and TCDD gene expression profiles was also observed. Furthermore, some genes were modulated by BaP but not by TCDD or BPDE, including induction of CRY1 and MAK, which may represent novel signaling pathways that are independent of both AHR activation and DNA damage. Promoter analysis identified candidate genes for direct transcriptional regulation by either AHR or p53. These analyses have further dissected and characterized the complex cellular response to BaP.
CitationChem. Res. Toxicol. 2007, 20 (12):1797-1810
JournalChemical Research in Toxicology
- Influence of TCDD and natural Ah receptor agonists on benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adduct formation in the Caco-2 human colon cell line.
- Authors: de Waard PW, de Kok TM, Maas LM, Peijnenburg AA, Hoogenboom RL, Aarts JM, van Schooten FJ
- Issue date: 2008 Jan
- Inhibitory effects of chrysoeriol on DNA adduct formation with benzo[a]pyrene in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.
- Authors: Takemura H, Nagayoshi H, Matsuda T, Sakakibara H, Morita M, Matsui A, Ohura T, Shimoi K
- Issue date: 2010 Jul-Aug
- Influence of cell cycle on responses of MCF-7 cells to benzo[a]pyrene.
- Authors: Hamouchene H, Arlt VM, Giddings I, Phillips DH
- Issue date: 2011 Jun 29
- 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin's suppression of 1-nitropyrene-induced p53 expression is mediated by cytochrome P450 1A1.
- Authors: Su JG, Huang MC, Chen FY
- Issue date: 2011 Dec 19
- Resveratrol, a natural aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist, protects lung from DNA damage and apoptosis caused by benzo[a]pyrene.
- Authors: Revel A, Raanani H, Younglai E, Xu J, Rogers I, Han R, Savouret JF, Casper RF
- Issue date: 2003 Jul-Aug