Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractHuman biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.
CitationInt J Hyg Environ Health 2013, 216 (5):599-605
SponsorsThis work was supported by the European FP7 project ECNIS 2 that builds a virtual European Center for Research and Education on Cancer, Environment and Food (ECRECEP) – Grant agreement 266198.
- Research on the socio-ethical impact of biomarker use and the communication processes in ECNIS NoE and NewGeneris IP.
- Authors: Dumez B, Van Damme K, Casteleyn L
- Issue date: 2007 May
- Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
- Authors: Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S
- Issue date: 2003 Nov-Dec
- [The origin of informed consent].
- Authors: Mallardi V
- Issue date: 2005 Oct
- Ethics issues experienced in HBM within Portuguese health surveillance and research projects.
- Authors: Reis MF, Segurado S, Brantes A, Simões HT, Melim JM, Geraldes V, Miguel JP
- Issue date: 2008 Jun 5
- Legal aspects of E-HEALTH.
- Authors: Callens S, Cierkens K
- Issue date: 2008